If you work in K-5 education in the United States right now, the short answer is this: the legislative ground has shifted, and fact fluency is no longer optional. Multiple states, including Illinois, Texas, and South Carolina, have passed or are rolling out 2025/2026 legislation requiring explicit instruction in maths, evidence-based screeners, and dedicated fact-fluency interventions for all K-5 students. That is a significant change. And the part I keep thinking about is the phrase "all students," because in practice, that has to mean students with learning differences, too.
Why This Wave of Legislation Matters Right Now
When I looked into what has been driving these mandates, the picture that emerged was pretty consistent. Declining NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) scores have pushed state legislatures to act decisively, and fact fluency has become the focal point. Think of it as the maths equivalent of the phonics movement in literacy. For years, researchers have argued that automatic recall of number facts is foundational to higher maths, in the same way that decoding words underpins reading comprehension. States have clearly taken that argument seriously.
What stood out to me reading the latest on this is that the mandates are not just about screeners and data collection. They are about intervention. Schools are being asked not just to identify which students are behind, but to do something evidence-based about it. That is a different and much more demanding ask.
The SEND Gap Nobody Is Talking About Loudly Enough
Here is the part that genuinely concerns me. In the rush to implement compliant programmes, there is a real risk that the tools schools reach for are designed for neurotypical learners and simply scaled down or sped up for students who need something structurally different.
Children with dyscalculia, ADHD, or maths anxiety do not just need more repetition. They often need a different entry point entirely. Rote drilling on a timer, for example, is well documented as a trigger for maths anxiety rather than a cure for it. The most common approach to fact fluency practice, timed worksheets or flashcard apps, is also the approach most likely to harm students who already struggle with maths confidence.
From the conversations we are having with schools early in our work at XTables Champions, this is exactly the tension educators are feeling. They know they need to build fluency. They are also worried that the tools available will set their most vulnerable students back. That gap between mandate and inclusive practice is where things get complicated.
As our founder Gal Darrash puts it, "The mandates are actually a good thing, because they force schools to take fact fluency seriously. But we want schools to ask the harder question: evidence-based for whom?"
What "Evidence-Based" Actually Has to Mean for Special Education
The phrase "evidence-based" appears throughout this new legislation, and rightly so. But evidence-based for general education populations does not automatically mean evidence-based for students receiving special education services. When I looked into this more carefully, a few principles emerged that genuinely inclusive fluency instruction needs to respect.
First, low-stakes practice matters enormously. Students with maths anxiety need repeated exposure in environments where making a mistake does not feel catastrophic. Games achieve this naturally, because the emotional context of play reframes errors as part of the process rather than evidence of failure.
Second, engagement has to be intrinsic, not coerced. Incentive systems that rely on comparison with peers can actively harm students with SEND, because they highlight gaps rather than progress. Intrinsic engagement, the kind that comes from a game a child genuinely wants to play, sustains practice without the anxiety spiral.
Third, multiplayer and social formats can be powerful when designed carefully. Collaboration and friendly competition within appropriately matched groups can build both fluency and confidence, as long as the underlying design is forgiving of different learning speeds.
This is what we have built XTables Champions around. Our approach uses popular game formats children already love, with multiplayer modes that make maths social and engaging rather than isolating. The design priorities come directly from SEND-friendly principles, which means that what works for a child with dyscalculia or ADHD also tends to work well for every other child in the room.
IDEA Funding and the Procurement Question
For schools navigating these new mandates, one practical question comes up quickly: how do we fund the right interventions? The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) allocates specific funding for tools and programmes that support students with disabilities in accessing the general curriculum. A maths fluency programme that is designed from the ground up for special education cohorts is not just a nice-to-have, it is a legitimate fit for IDEA funding streams.
What I am seeing is that many districts are searching specifically for solutions that satisfy both the new state mandates and their IDEA obligations at the same time, in a single tool, rather than running separate programmes. That dual-purpose approach makes procurement simpler and, more importantly, means students with SEND are not pulled out for a separate, lower-quality experience.
XTables Champions was built to be that kind of tool. Because our design started with neurodivergent and SEND learners rather than adding accessibility as an afterthought, it meets the evidence-based bar for special education precisely because it meets it for the students everyone else tends to forget in these conversations.
The Question Worth Asking Your Current Provider
If you are a K-5 maths lead, special education coordinator, or school leader reviewing your fluency programme against your state's new requirements, the question I would encourage you to put to any provider is this: show me how this works specifically for students with dyscalculia, maths anxiety, or ADHD. Not in theory. In practice.
Evidence-based should mean evidence that holds for your most complex learners, not just your median ones.
Talk to Us
At XTables Champions, we are at an early stage as a company, and we are genuinely interested in talking with educators who are grappling with exactly this challenge. If you are a SENCO, a special education coordinator, a K-5 maths lead, or a school leader trying to meet your state's new fluency mandates without compromising on your SEND students, we would love to hear from you.
Visit xtableschampions.com or get in touch directly to talk through how XTables Champions works in practice for students with maths anxiety and learning differences. We are not here to sell you something generic. We want to understand your situation and be honest about whether we are the right fit.